Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Patrick's Pick's - The Ten Worst Films of 2014

by Patrick Gibbs


2014 is last year's news. Ol' Daddy Earth is fixin' to make one more trip round the sun (name that movie), and as such, it's time to take a look back at the best and worst films of the year. While watching and analyzing the best films is a rewarding and artistically fulfilling experience, it's so much more fun to talk about the bad ones because it gives me a chance to get in touch with my inner bastard.

I want you to take a moment to reflect on the fact that Michael Bay directed a 4th Transformers movie this year, and executive produced a new version of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and they didn't even make this list. If that frightens you (as it should), you might want to stop reading now. But if you are brave enough to plunge ahead, then let's take a look at my picks for the 10 Wost Films of 2014.


1. INTO THE STORM

If Twister and The Blair Witch Project had a one night stand, their love child would probably turn out a lot like this movie. Into The Storm, which follows both a group of tornado chasers and a single father and his two High School age sons on the day of a major natural disaster, desperately wants to pull off the"found footage" style, but it also wants to be a special effects blockbuster. Now, perhaps that could work. But not with a full orchestral score, multiple, intersecting storylines, and underwater shots. The filmmakers try to explain the exhaustive amount of coverage by coming up with contrived excuses for every single damn character to be packing a camera of some sort (even if it is an early '90's model camcorder, it provides pristine, HD quality media  that has been fully color corrected), but even then, there are overhead tornado shots in this movie that you couldn't get in a documentary if you strapped a Go Pro to God's forehead. The cast is uniformly dreadful, with the surprisingly charmless and stilted Richard Armitage of The Hobbit doing his best to make you appreciate how believable Gerard Butler is as the average American everyman. Not since The Happening has a serious thriller inspired this kind of spontaneous, uproarious laughter from the entire audience. When leaving the press screening, the studio rep asked for feedback on the movie; my co-host responded "a cancerous polyp on the anus of cinema" and the rep not only didn't blink an eye, he actually wrote it down word for word. 



2. LEFT BEHIND

I know that God works in mysterious ways, but why anyone thought it was a good idea to reboot the Born Again Christian franchise that didn't make Kirk Cameron into the superstar he isn't today and cast Nicolas Cage and his hair plugs is beyond my understanding. Cage plays Rayford Steele (seriously), an airline pilot who has been trying to adjust to the serious illness called Christianity that his wife (Lea Thompson) has contracted. He takes this major life change in stride, supporting her in every way he can short of not having an affair or taking every opportunity to call her crazy behind her back. Meanwhile, his college student daughter Chloe (Cassi Williams), who thinks Mom is even crazier than Dad does, tries to surprise her Dad by coming home for his birthday only to find out that he is flying to London. She finds him at the airport, acting very friendly with a hot young flight attendant and not wearing his wedding ring ("Oh, my ring? I never wear that when I fly, honey.")  Angry, brooding and constantly trying to provide exactly enough sex appeal to help sell this thing while at the same time remembering that it is a Christian movie, she meets and is swept off her feet by ruggedly handsome investigative journalist Buck Williams (Chad Michael Murray), and the two bond over talk about how stupid it is that anyone can believe in a God that allows Tsunami's, wars, and Nicolas Cage's hairplugs.

Rayford and Buck (which sounds like a '70's sitcom) board the flight, and while they are in the air, something totally unexpected and not at all foreshadowed happens . . .  every child and several of the adults on the flight vanish into thin airleaving their clothes and all of their belongings on their seats.

 After nearly colliding with another plane that is (dum dum dum) not being piloted by anyone, and finally making radio contact with the ground to discover that this phenomenon is going on world wide, Steele realizes that the rapture is upon us. Yes, that's right, this movie expects us to believe that despite Casual Sex? Howard The Duck, The Beverly Hillbillies and Caroline In The City, Lea Thompson gets to go to heaven ahead of the rest of us.

The movie is filled with insipid and offensive characters, from the angry compulsive gambler played by Martin Klebba (the diminutive buccaneer in Pirates of The Caribbean) who has a gigantic chip on his shoulder and is constantly spoliling for a fight, even before anything goes wrong, and forcing even the most liberal minded viewer to stoop to a cheap joke to the effect that we all should have known that when the rapture hit, Snow White and the other 6 dwarves would make it but Grumpy was screwed, to the devout Muslim who is instantly suspected of involvement when people disappear, but is actually a nice guy and encourages everyone to pray but of course doesn't get to go to heaven because (bzzzzz), "Sorry, Hassid! You guessed the wrong God! But we do have some lovely parting gifts for you," to the sassy black mother named Shasta Carvell (what is the deal with these names???) portrayed by American Idol's Jordan Sparks, who finds the air marshal's gun and accuses every passenger of being on her estranged husband's payroll and faking this whole thing.

When the plane finally lands safely because Chloe has seen Die Hard 2 (what the hell, she's not going to heaven anyway) our three leads look out on all of the devastation around them. "Is this the end?" Chloe asks. "No," Rayford's hairplugs reply, "This is only the beginning," the credits roll, and at the end a caption reads: Jesus Christ Will Return in  YOU'RE ONLY BORN TWICE (release date unannounced), and then we cut to a stinger that reveals Thanos and Barack Obama smilingly evily and preparing for the next stage of their diabolical plan. 

3. TRANSCENDENCE

Celebrated cinematographer and first time director Wally Pfister attempts to explore the "what if?"scenario that human consciousness might be able to live on in positronic form after the body dies, but only really manages to explore the question "If Johnny Depp can ruin a movie by overacting, can he ruin one just as effectively by not acting at all?"

In fairness to Depp, putting all of the blame for this colossal failure on his head is like blaming the failure of an entire building to stay standing on a single brick (though the brick would undoubtedly show more charisma.). The biggest flaw (which is quite a feat) in this stupid as can be but deadly serious debacle is that it's trying to be a "Love Never Dies" story that is based around a romantic couple (Depp and Rebecca Hall) that is so indescribably dull and utterly devoid of charm that it is not only impossible to care about them, but also to even speculate as to a single quality either one found appealing in the other in the first place. Paul Bettany tries admirably to give something resembling a good performance, but this movie may have cemented his reputation as a magnet for bad material. In the end, the only one who comes off looking good in all of this is M. Night Shyamalan, simply because the filmmakers proved that an overblown, pretentious and hair brained mainstream sci fi movie does not in fact require his involvement in order to suck.

                                                                                    
4. 300: RISE OF AN EMPIRE

The follow up to the runaway tits and togas hit of 2006  that turned director Zack Snyder and star Gerard Butler into sought after Hollywood commodities. But there were some obstacles to a sequel: 1. with Batman Vs. Superman: Dawn of A Franchise, on his plate, Snyder was too busy to direct this time around, and Butler's character, King Leonidas, was a bit too dead to return, along with the rest of the title characters, who became speedo clad martyrs at the battle of Thermopolaye. So how to do a sequel? What about a prequel? No, wait: a pre-seq- during-quel! Nobody's ever done that! The movie will take place before, after, and at the very same time as the first story, in different parts of Greece and Persia. Yeah! That'll be coherent as hell. Noam Murro, whose only feature credit is 2008's Smart People (this movie could have used some of them) takes the helm as director, but how to fill the sandals of Gerard Butler, whose Leonidas was Russell Crowe, Arnold Schwartzenegger, Fabio, and Scrooge McDuck in all rolled into one? So much work had gone into creating Leonidas, from the daily regimen of steroid sandwiches and bench pressing locomotives to the inspired direction "growl a lot, and if there's any black mascara left over from your beard, rub it around your eyes." How does one go about filling such a gaping void? Well, producer Snyder apparently ran a Google search on the words "gaping void" and came back with Sullivan Stapelton, who may not have Butler's oily, exploding pectorals, but more than makes up for it with a charisma and star quality the likes of which we haven't seen since George Coraface in Christopher Columbus: The Discovery. Stapelton plays Thortestacles, a General or something who fights for the glory of all of Greece, not just Sparta, and realizes that if Leonidas, Davy Crockett and the rest of the brave 300 die a glorious death in battle, he can sell a lot of bumper stickers and rally enough support to win the war. Eva Green provides the glistening chest this time around in the role of Amnesia, the blood thirsty villainess who inspires The God King Twerxes, and between a tasteful and low key sequence wherein Stapelton and Green meet on a boat to conduct the kind of vigorous peace talks that would cost upward of two grand a night in Vegas (on the table, up against the wall, in the jacuzzi, with knives, without knives . . .), the grand, Shakespearean quality dialogue ("Shut yer f*ckhole!)  and the constant "Old Faithful" style geysers of blood that, thank heavens, come in glorious 3D this time around, this movie takes the term "in your face" to new lows.

5. RIDE ALONG

When a legendary, hard boiled Atlanta Police Detective (Ice Cube) learns that his sister's loser boyfriend (Kevin Hart) has not only proposed to her, but been accepted into the police academy (despite the fact that he failed the "making funny noises" test), he invites the prospective  boy in blue on a ride along, to, and I quote: "Show me what kinda man you made of." Not a movie to be held down by conventions and stereotypes, this "comedy" does valiantly attempt to avoid stereotypes by steering clear of anything even mildly amusing for its entire 139 minute run time. With four credited screenwriters, you would think that at least one of them would have tried to write at least one decent line of dialogue.


6. VAMPIRE ACADEMY

Brothers Mark Waters (director of Mean Girls) and Daniel Waters (writer of Heathers), were bound to team up eventually, and as long as they were doing so, why not make a teenage vampire soap that will make feel like you personally owe Stephanie Meyer an apology by the halfway mark?  Vampire Academy follows 17 year old Rose, a "Dhampir" (half human, half vampire) who is the bodyguard for a "Moroi" (the peaceful and sweet kind of Vampire), and the "story" involves their teenage adventures both in and out of St. Vladimir's Academy. Zoey Deutch, in the role of Rose, gives us an idea of what it would be like if Ellen Page got possessed by the same demon that took control of Meg Ryan's body in 1995 and caused her to devote all of her time and energy to being self consciously cute, with the added annoyance that Deutch is trying to be both cute and a bad ass at the same time. But this movie isn't even remotely bad ass, it's just plain ass bad.

7. POMPEII

Lava means never having to say you're sorry.

Gladiator meets Titantic in director Paul W.S. Anderson's big screen atrocity. Set in 79 A.D., Pompeii tells the epic story of Milo (Kit Harington), a slave turned invincible gladiator who finds himself in a race against time to save his true love Cassia (Emily Browning), the beautiful daughter of a wealthy merchant who has been unwillingly betrothed to a corrupt Roman Senator (Keifer Sutherland.). As Mount Vesuvius erupts in a torrent of blazing lava, Milo must fight his way out of the arena in order to save his beloved as the once magnificent Pompeii crumbles around him. Sutherland seems to be enjoying himself in his hammy portrayal of the lascivious Senator, and one pictures the contract negotiations going something like this:
"Keifer, we want you for this movie. It's a meaty role, a period piece, and a real change of pace for you that could be really exciting."

" I . . . uhhhh . . . [Expletive Deleted] . . ."

"You can drink on set."

"I'm in."

In the final shot of this movie, our lovers kiss passionately as the lava consumes them, only to be frozen into perfect statues made of ash, which then scatter because as it turns out, all we are is dust in the wind.

8. NEED FOR SPEED       

If you've ever found yourself wishing for a movie that was part Fast and Furious, part Michael Bay, and part Cannonball Run . . . well, first off, for the love of all that is holy, do not reproduce. Second, this is the movie for you!

Based on the popular video game of the same name (because that always works), Need For Speed follows the story of Tobey Marshall (Breaking Bad's Aaron Paul), a former race car driver who owns a garage in Mt. Kisco, New York.  Struggling to make ends meet, he and his crew race at night using their modified cars.

After a local racing gathering, Tobey's former, rival, Dino Brewster (Dominic Cooper, giving us the answer to the question "What if the role of Iceman in Top Gun had been played by Snidely Whiplash?") arrives at his garage with an offer to pay Tobey to finish the build on . . . get this . . . a Ford Shelby Mustang! If you don't know what that is, don't worry: it's explained at least 63 times throughout the film. Even though he doesn't like Dino, Tobey accepts the deal.

Tobey drives the Mustang against Dino's objections at a nearby track and reaches 234 mph, prompting a buyer to take the car on the spot for $2.7 million.  Dino then challenges Tobey and his cute little hero worshiping sidekick Pete to race against him, from his uncle's mansion to a bridge over Interstate 684. If Tobey wins, he gets Dino's 75% of the Mustang deal; if he loses, Pete must die in a fiery crash and Tobey will go to jail for illegal racing and manslaughter while Dino burns rubber out of there. Amazingly, Tobey accept the terms and loses.

We jump ahead to when Tobey is paroled, and he has a plan: he will enter the De Leon, an illegal race set up by a mysterious racing fan called Monarch (played by Michael Keaton in what is almost literally a phoned in performance, as we see Monarch almost exclusively through webcam broadcasts, during which he does a bad Wolfman Jack impression and talks about Tobey until he becomes borderline sexually aroused.). Dino will be competing in the race as well, and if Tobey beats Dino, that will, of course, more than make up for Pete's death. Tobey gets in touch with the buyer of the Ford Shelby Mustang (seriously, a Ford Shelby, man!), who agrees to let him race it, provided he is accompanied by at least one a busty blond with a Spice Girls British accent. He reluctantly agrees.

But of course, the race is in San Francisco in just over 24 hours, so Tobey and Knight Rider Barbie must race to get to the race so that Tobey can race in the final race. On the way, they fall in love, damage a lot of property, are carried by a helicopter, and the Ford Shelby Mustang (yes, an actual Ford Shelby Mustang) is demolished by a semi truck while Barbie is inside, which means she has to be rushed to the hospital, where she is declared to be in critical condition, which means they put a Hello Kitty band aid on her forehead. But does this stop our hero from competing? Of course not! Not when . . . well, whatever it is he thinks he is going to accomplish . . .  is at stake. He steals the illegal car that Dino used in the race that got Pete killed, races against him, and when Dino rolls his car and and goes up in flames as Tobey nears the finish line, Tobey has a "My face under Darth Vader's mask" moment and realizes he must turn around and pull Dino to safety. He then wins the race, and the police seize the car he stole from Dino, which is all the evidence they need to press charges against Dino and have Tobey legally declared the good guy.

And I left out the stupid parts.


9. SABOTAGE

Director David Ayer (End of Watch, Fury and the upcoming DC Comics action flick Suicide Squad) teams with no less a macho icon than Arnold Schwarzenegger himself in this ultra violent, ultra pointless mystery about a DEA S.W.A.T. team that steals millions of dollars in drug money only to have it disappear and ends up turning on each other. The actors are really giving it their all, especially Arnold, Sam Worthington and the talented Mireille Enos (World War Z, The Killing), but there is simply no rising above this material (which perhaps explains why Olivia Williams and Terrence Howard make the rather bold choice to set out to actually sink below it.). This movie is oozing testosterone from every orifice, but its hard to justify the violence as adding to the reality when it includes moments like finding a corpse nailed to the ceiling, or Arnold and Williams finding a river of blood leaking from Worthington's refrigerator only to the discover that his eviscerated corpse has been stuffed inside. This is pure exploitation filmmaking at its worst, and the solution to the mystery is so preposterous and unmotivated that it literally feels those times when you were a kid when you would play "Murder Mystery" with one friend, your sister and a bunch of stuffed animals in your back yard and didn't bother to decide who the killer was until two thirds of the way through and never really bothered to come up with a motive (ok, fine, maybe nobody else actually did that and it's a lousy analogy, but I stand by it.).

10. THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2                                                                 

It seems callous to kick Sony while it's down, and I need to be clear that I do not support cyberterrorism, despise censorship, and think that Kim Jong Un and the government of North Korea
are an obscene stain upon humanity. All that being said, if the whole thing results in no Amazing Spider-Man 3 and the character going over to MARVEL Studios . . . hot damn!

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is shrill, frenetic, incoherent and the same time surprisingly dull, making not only all of the same mistakes as Spider-Man 3 but many of the same ones as Batman & Robin (yes, I compared it to the comic book Anti-Christ, and I am not budging on that. It's as campy and overblown a franchise killer as that film was, and time, combined with leaked Sony emails, are proving me right.).  Director Marc Webb and the various screenwriters are trying so hard to juggle so many elements that we can only be sure they even remember that there is an audience watching this because they take every opportunity to insult its intelligence. In short, the characters don't work, the plot is convoluted beyond words, the dialogue is sometimes laugh out loud silly, and the action is overblown and boring (and done almost entirely in slow motion for no apparent reason.).

A talented cast is more than wasted, they are humiliated. Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone and especially Sally Field are certainly not without moments, but they come across as the acting equivalent of the musicians on the deck of the Titanic trying to give the passengers a false sense that things are under control. Jamie Foxx seems to be under the mistaken impression that he is still on In Living Color, and the look his character has been given, complete with overbite and the most ridiculous comb over I have ever seen outside of the church I went to growing up, leave one expecting Nicholas Cage to walk on at any moment and say "Dude, who does your hair?"

Dane DeeHaan's Harry Osborne had potential, but the script and the direction force this talented young actor to take things off into cartoon mad scientist territory far too quickly, and he falls in with Foxx and Colm Feore's ridiculous antics. And of course there's Paul Giammatti (No, I did not forget he was in this film. But it seems like Marc Webb almost did.). His appearance as "Rhino" at the end of the film plays like an ill advised parody of the last sequence of The Incredibles.

In summary, any movie that actually causes me to applaud when Emma Stone dies because it means the film is almost over really has problems. I realize that there is vocal group out there that insists on defending this film, and I support your right to be wrong, and let me say with all sincerity that I hope you enjoy the rest of the flight and that you have brought along a portable device to watch this movie. I will be stepping out early.

        *                                                *                                                                   *

So that about wraps it up for 2014, but January is almost here, so we can expect plenty of odious cinema coming our way, including the long awaited release of The Seventh Son (the one where Rooster Cogburn dresses up as a Knight to fight dragons) and the new Will Smith - Margot Robbie "drama" which, according to the conclusions I jumped to while zoning out during the trailer, is about a successful pimp who has a knack for matching Johns to their ideal hooker (Will Smith is Bitch.). Have a safe and Happy New Year, and please keep Star Wars Episode VII in your prayers (as long as you are a devout Christian. If not, God just lets it go to the machine.).




Thursday, December 25, 2014

UNBROKEN

Reviewed by  Paul Gibbs & Patrick Gibbs








GRADE: A +

Jack O'Connell, Domnhall Gleeson, Garrett Hedlund,
Miyavi, Jai Courtney, Finn Witrock, Alex Russell

Screenplay by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen and Richard LaGravense and William Nicholson
Directed by Angelina Jolie
Rated PG -13 (violence, adult themes, profanity)

The story of Louis Zamperini is a harrowing, inspiring drama that was crying out to be made into a major motion picture, and the success of Laura Hillenbrand's book assured that it would be. What was less obvious was that Angelina Jolie would be the one to tell it. Fortunately, not only does the acclaimed actress prove herself to be a major talent behind the camera, she also has the brains to surround herself with people who are at the top of their field, from screenwriters to editors to a master cinematographer. The result is an old fashioned Hollywood epic that ranks among the more impressive efforts we've seen from an up and coming actor/director, worthy of comparison to the Oscar-winning successes of Mel Gibson and Kevin Costner from the 90s. And in many ways it plays more like a 90s film that a 2014 release, Not only is it something of a stylistic throwback, but Jolie's restraint in depicting the horrors of war and Zamperini's resilience to them is something we rarely see in today's Hollywood. She has managed to keep the film appropriate for the family audience it's trying to reach without it feeling like a whitewash.

Born in 1917, Zamperini (played most of the way by Jack O'Connell, in a breakout performance) lead an extraordinary life. The son of Italian immigrants, Zamperini begins the film as a delinquent getting into fights, sneaking booze and generally causing his family no end of headaches. When his old brother Pete spots young Louis' gift for running, that becomes an outlet for turning his life around. Soon, Louis is running in the 1936 Berlin Olympics.

With the beginning of World War II, Zamperini becomes a bomber on a B-24. When his plane is shot down, he and two other crewmembers (Domnall Gleeson and  FinnWitrock) spend 40 days adrift in a life raft without the benefit of a volleyball or a tiger.  Unfortunately, when rescue finally comes its at the hands of the enemy, and Zamperini is forced to spend the rest of the war in a Japanese prison camp, where a brutal corporal (Miyavi) singles him out for some of the worst treatment.

While it's a fairly predictable yarn of determination and heroism winning out against impossible odds, Unbroken is saved from becoming maudlin by the skill of those in front of and behind the camera, and by Jolie's obvious sincere respect for Zamperini, which avoids becoming fawning hero worship. Jolie credits co-screenwriters Joel and Ethan Coen for keeping the film from becoming excessively sentimental (it may teeter too close to that for some tastes, but not ours), and composer Alexander Desplat helps elicit emotion with another moving score. But the MVP may well be director of photography Roger Deakins, who works with Jolie to create a look that reminded us of David Lean and Steven Spielberg (especially Empire of the Sun, which was essentially Spielberg doing David Lean). And along with editors William Goldenberg (Oscar winner for Argo) and Tim Squyres, Jolie has escaped the inexperienced director trap of letting her epic drag on too long and lose its sense of pacing. Finally, she's served well by her cast, which is also served well by her capable direction. O'Connell has a charisma and presence which make it easy for him to carry a film like this on his shoulders, and he's ably backed up by the likes of Gleeson and Garrett Hedlund.

While it's sure to be too conventional and "inspirational" for some (as evidenced by the mixed reviews), we found Unbroken to be a moving and life-affirming film which showed a potentially exciting future for Jolie as a director. It swept us up in its narrative and kept us hooked for its 2 hour and 17 minute run time, and wasn't easy to shake off for a few days after. Its not going to win a lot of fans among the edgy post-modern crowd, but for those who can appreciate a skillfully woven and inspiring portrait of survival, it may be the perfect film for the holiday season. For us it ranks among the best movie-going experiences of 2014, where it's a major Oscar player or not.

Unbroken is rated PG-13 for realistic but surprisingly restrained violence, a little bit of profanity and some heavy adult themes. It's an actual,literal PG-13, an incredibly rare case where the MPAA rating actually seems to have it right.  Don't take children much younger than that but there's nothing in it a 13 year old can't handle.

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

INTO THE WOODS

GRADE: B+
Starring Meryl Streep, Emily Blunt, James Corden, Anna Kendrick, Chris Pine
Screenplay by James Lapine
Based on the musical by James Lapine and Stephen Sondheim
Directed by Rob Marshall
Rated PG-13 (watered-down violence and implied sexuality)
Reviewed by Paul Gibbs

If there's anything I find harder to review than an adaptation of a book, it's an adaptation of stage musical. Musical theatre fans are as hard-core obsessive as any comic books nerds, and as much as they love their musicals, they hate any production which does something they don't like. Usually this is true of a movie version, so even if I loved the film I find it difficult to review because I know there's a good chance the most devoted fans will despise it for reasons I probably can't even see coming. On the other hand, while hardly a musical theatre buff, having spent much of my life in community theatre I have a filmiarity with and understanding of the medium, which means I find it hard to understand where other film geeks and critics are coming from much of the time as well. Many of them don't "get" musicals. Some even ask  "Why are they singing?" So, as someone with a foot in both worlds, i feel i have a unique perspective (not to say it's better than any other, just that's unique).  As it turns out, Into the Woods is one of the few stage musicals I wouldn't hesitate to call brilliant. It's hilarious, imaginative, touching and surprisingly profound.  So I went into this one with a lot of apprehension. Did they get it right? Well, yes and no.

The story begins with a disparate group of fairy-tale characters, each singing about their situation: a Baker and whis Wife (James Corden and Emily Blunt) want a child;Cinderella (Anna Kendrick) wants to go to the Prince's festival; Jack (Daniel Huttlestone) must sell his beloved cow, and Little Red Riding Hood (Lilla Crawford) is headed to see her grandmother in the woods. But when an a Witch (Meryl Streep) shows up at the Baker's home, she sets the plot in motion by telling the Baker and his Wife that a curse has been placed on their family, and in order to have children they must bring back a series of items she needs.

For the most part, the first act goes rather smoothly. Marshall has mounted a good production of the material, and most of his cast serves him well. Streep has a little trouble getting the rapid fire rhythm of her first song, but from there on plays the character rather well (it's pointless to compare her to the original Broadway Witch, Bernadette Peters. Musical or not, that was stage show and this is a movie, and the requisite acting styles are different). Chris Pine is a hilarious standout as Cinderella's Prince, and Corden and Blunt are wonderful as the Baker and his Wife. The only performances that really bothered me was the only I knew wood, Johnny Depp as the Wolf. His odd zoot suit design doesn't fit the rest of the film at all, his singing isn't very good, and he all around sticks out like a sore thumb. It's a rare case where audiences may wish the character was CGI (I certainly did). Still in all, I find most of the first act section to be a high quality cinematic adaptation of the stage work, with Marshall finding inventive ways to make a very talking musical more visual (this is especially helpful in Jack and Red Riding Hood's songs).

Of course, those who know Into the Woods know it takes a darker, more serious turn in the second act, and that's where the film runs into some trouble. Little important content is outright removed, but some is watered-down to a point that robs it of some its power, and which also renders it confusing (a violent death has been changed to be caused by an act that doesn't seem remotely violent enough to kill someone). And some great songs are cut, including a a variation of the song Agony (my choice as the all-time musical theatre showstopper) sung by Cinderella's Prince and his brother (Billy Magnesson) which not only robs the audience of a great moment, it robs the Prince's of some of their character and lessens the nuance of the second act (it should be noted that Pine, Magnesson and director Marshall hit the first Agony out of the. However, the overall drama and staging of the second act is still pulled off well, with the song The Last Midnight performed well by Streep and perfectly directed by Marshall to give the sequence the kind of magic only film can. . Marshall's particular gift as a filmmaker is an understanding of both the stage musical and film mediums, and blending them well (thankfully this time he abandons the "stage of my mind" motif he used in both Chicago and Nine).

All in all, I found Into the Woods to be a good film, and a good production of the musical.  But as an  adaptation , some questionable choices have been made with cuts Disneyizing. These tweaks aren't as bad as some fans feared, but they're probably enough to upset many fans nonetheless. as a film on its own merit it's great fun. It's colorful, it's energetic, it's funny, it's magical, and deeper than you might expect. AInto the Woods (Pine alone is worth the price of admission). But because of the cuts it falls short of being the all time classic the source material deserves to be.
nd I still feel it's an overall good version of

Where the stage show would be a PG-13 for violence and adult/sexual themes, the movie is toned down enough to be a Disney-friendly PG (though families who don't know the play may want to consider it an old school PG, when that wasn't the standard rating for a kids movie and PG could include more adult content, including some discreetly portrayed adultery).

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

THE HOBBIT: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

Reviewed by Paul Gibbs


GRADE: A
Starring Ian McKellan, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage, Cate Blanchett, Ken Stott, Orlando Bloom
Screenplay by Peter Jackson & Fran Walsh  &Phillipa Boyens & Guillermo Del Toro
Directed by Peter Jackson
Rated PG-13 for war violence

Relax, it's good.

Peter Jackson's The Hobbit trilogy has garnered decidedly mixed reactions, especially compared to his more universally beloved and acclaimed Lord of the Rings trilogy, most of it having to do with the often obvious padding required to turn one fairly short novel into three epic films. Thankfully, he has arguably saved the best for last in The Battle of the Five Armies, a thrilling, emotional and above all just plain satisfying epic. While (for all its admitted shortcomings) I am an unabashed fan of the Hobbit film series, I suspect even some Jackson/Tolkien fans who've been underwhelmed so far will greet Five Armies a little more warmly. Yes, it's still a bit overstuffed and takes liberties with the source material, but it doesn't take as many lengthy detours, and it wraps things up in such a satisfying manner that I felt closer to having seen the Hobbit movie (singular, not plural) I'd always imagined. No, those who truly hated the first two films won't be won over. But those who were ambivalent might find themselves with more positive feelings about the series as a whole. While I rank the leisurely-paced An Unexpected Journey as the most charming chapter,  and the thrilling adventure of The Desolation of Smaug the most fun, The Battle of the Five Armies is the most complete of the trilogy, and not just because it's the only one that gets to build to a full resolution. Jackson and his cohorts have effectively mixed the dramatic elements this time around to give us a rousing climax.

The story picks up where The Desolation of Smaug left off, with the fearsome dragon (who I have no doubt half the audience still lusts after because he's voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch) swooping in to destroy Lake Town, and the heroic Bard the Bowman (Luke Evans) doing his best to defend home and family from the winged menace. Meanwhile, Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage) has assumed his rightful place as King Under the Mountain in the dwarf kingdom of Erebor. But Thorin has changed: he's becoming increasingly greedy and paranoid, so much so that Bilbo (Martin Freeman) is afraid to give him the coveted Arkenstone. After Smaug is defeated,  the men of what remains of Lake Town come to Erebor looking for shelter, help and the gold Thorin promised them. But Thorin's greed gets the better of him, and he refuses to keep his promise. Meanwhile, the wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellan)  is still off dealing with the Necromancer, who were learned in The Desolation of Smaug is actually the evil lord Sauron, and the orc Azog (Manu Bennett) converges his armies to march on Erebor, as does the wood-elf king Thranduil (Lee Pace). Soon, all of the groups converge for the titular altercation, an extended set piece which rivals the battles of Helm's Deep and the Pelinor Fields for the most spectacular of Jackson's career.

Despite a small change from the source material which bothered me, the battle with Smaug is every bit as thrilling and spectacular as I hoped. And the film just keeps getting better from there, ramping up the drama and battle action in ways which recall the Oscar-winning The Return of the King. Character interactions are deepened (especially between Bilbo and Thorin, with Freeman and Armitage both doing excellent work), all plot threads come together, and Jackson again proves he can shoot a battle scene as well as any filmmaker in history. Some of the action here is wildly inventive, and as usual Jackson shows an ability to make what would likely normally seem horrific (like decapitations) thrilling and even funny. However, it's worth pointing out that, while short of blood and gore, the film is filled with wall-to-wall violence. Among the emotional character moments, the relationship between dreamy dwarf Killi and elf babe Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly)  feels more than a little rushed. These characters have had very few actual interactions, after all. But Turner and Lilly, along with Jackson, sell it so well that I found my sense of logic losing out to the emotion. Besides, even if he's too good-looking to be a dwarf, there's a short guy part of me that can't help but love the idea of an elf girl falling for a dwarf.


My only real complaints come from the fact that the CGI is sometimes less convincing than it should be (a few sequences with Orlando Bloom's Legolas drift into Playstation territory), and far too much screen time is given to annoying and unfunny comic relief from the weaselly Alfrid (Ryan Gage). Otherwise, I feel Jackson has given us a thrilling, stirring, eye-popping epic that ranks with the best blockbusters of recent years and cements this trilogy's overall success. This is a film which recognizes that big emotions are as important as sweeping vistas and massive armies to creating an epic. Watching it, the problems inherent in stretching the book out to three films faded from my mind, and I found myself reveling in the glory of Jackson's Middle Earth, one of the most memorable world in the history of literature, and now cinema. Freeman is now as definitive to me as Bilbo as Elijah Wood is as Frodo, and the dwarves have been done justice (which is a huge statements from . I'd be depressed to have the series end if we weren't getting that other fantasy trilogy starting up next year. While The Hobbit t hasn't been the unqualified success that The Lord of the Rings was, I feel it has been an overall satisfying voyage there and back again.

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies easily ranks among the best blockbusters of 2014 for me. It's rated PG-13 for intense battle violence that (as always) would easily earn it an R if theses were people getting hacked and smashed instead of orcs.






Saturday, December 13, 2014

CHRISTMAS FILMS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED

by Paul Gibbs

Looking fora Christmas movie that's a little off the beaten path? Not necessarily Die Hard or Black Christmas, but a change of pace from the stuff you've seen a million times? Here are a few suggestions for Christmas movies that you may not have seen.




SANTA CLAUS: THE MOVIE (1985) 

After Christopher Reeve left the Superman franchise and audiences justifiably ignored Supergirl, producers/shipping magnates Alexander and Illya Salkind hoped to start a new franchise by giving Santa Claus the same treatment. This movie wouldn't be featured here if they'd succeeded (it was ignored by audiences and mostly savaged by critics), but while Santa Claus has its faults, it also has its charms. The design (by a mix of those brought us Richard Donner's Superman before and Tim Burton's Batman after) is imaginative and a lot of fun, with Santa's old fashioned workshop a highlight. Henry Mancini's score is bouncy and fun, and Dudley Moore's lovably scatter-brained elf Patch is a likable protagonist. And we haven't even gotten to the Big Lebowsi himself, David Huddleston, as one of the better live-actions Santas. The child actors are weak (sometimes to an annoying degree), the script is spotty, and John  Lithgow's Lex Luthor-esque evil toymaker is a perfect example of one of those over the top Lithgow performances that is alternately amusing and just irritating, but there's enough in director Jeannot Swzarc (Jaws 2, Somewhere in Time, Supergirl) made one of his more entertaining films here, and I've actually been a little surprised by how few people I encounter are familiar with it.




A CHRISTMAS CAROL (1984)

Okay, you've seen over 200 versions of Dicken's masterpiece. But this Clive Donner directed
TV production from 1984 may be as close to a definitive translation of the actual book as you'll ever see. George C. Scott brings what I can only call a Shakespearean flair to his Ebenezar Scrooge, and he's surrounded by an excellent cast, including David Warner as Bob Cratchit, Roger Rees as Fred, Lucy Gutteridge as Belle, Joanne Whalley as Fan, and maybe best of all, Edward "The Equalizer" Woodward as the Ghost of Christmas Present. If Merchant Ivory in their heyday had chosen to make a holiday film, this is what they would have come up with.









ARTHUR CHRISTMAS (2011)
Aardman, the British animation studio behind Wallace and Grommit and Chicken Run gave us a film that should be a required part of everyone's Christmas, but it was lost in the shuffle of a very crowded holiday season where even Martin Scorsese had a family-friendly film out.  Arthur (voiced by X-Men's James McAvoy) is the younger son of the current Santa Claus (voiced by Jim Boradbent), and while he loves Christmas, he's a screw-up perpetually in the shadow of his older brother Steve (voiced by Hugh Laurie). But when a mistake is made and a child in Trelew, Cornwall is left without a gift, Arthur and his grandfather (a retired former Santa voiced by Bill Night) set out to make it right.  Arthur Christmas is as heartwarming as you might expect, but it's also hilarious, with that distinctive flavor of British comedy (even sometimes the sort biting, edgy, Black Adder style). A must-see.

Friday, December 12, 2014

EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS

 
Reviewed by Patrick Gibbs

GRADE:  B+
Christian Bale, Joel Edgerton, Ben Kingsley, John Turturro, Aaron Paul, Tara Fitzgerald and Sigourney Weaver
Screenplay by Adam Cooper, Bill Collage, Jeffrey Caine and Steven Zaillian
Directed by Ridley Scott
Rated PG-13 for R-rated violence (I give up on understanding the ratings system.).

Exdous: Gods and Kings is a better follow up to Gladiator than 2009's Robin Hood, which wasn't bad, per se, but was so stilted and aloof that it played like it desperately needed an enema.  That's the good news. The bad news is, Exodus: Gods and Kings is trying too hard much of the time to be Gladiator, which in an of itself is nothing new: just this year both The Legend of Hercules and Pompeii have blatantly ripped off Gladiator, and over the past decade or so everything from Troy to 300 to (I am not making this up) Zorro! The Musical have at best worn the influence of Scott's triumphant epic on their sleeve and at worst come close to plagiarism. But when it gets to the point that Scott himself is doing it, complete with lifting lines of dialogue directly from that film and playing the Moses-Seti-Ramses dynamic as a variation on Maximus-Marcus Aurellius-Commodus (though Ramses is far less creepy), it's a bit ridiculous. What's more, at times Scott seems to be having a go at Robin Hood again, as he has given Moses a band of Merry Men whom he instructs in the proper use of the bow and arrow, and at one point I thought that any moment Ramses was going to hold an archery tournament to try and draw out Moses. And then there's the presence of Sigourney Weaver in her once every decade or so "yes, this is a Ridley Scott movie and I was Ellen Ripley" role.

The film follows the well established story of Moses, but from a different angle. Instead of starting with a baby in a basket, we begin in in 1300 B.C, with Moses (Bale) as a general and member of the royal family, preparing  to attack the Hittie army with Prince Ramses (Edgerton). Seti I (Turturro) tells the two men of a recent prophecy in which one will save the other and become a leader. During the attack on the Hittites, Moses saves Ramses' life, leaving both men troubled. Later, Moses is sent to the city of Pithom. Upon his arrival, he encounters the slave Joshua (Paul) and is appalled by the horrific conditions of the slaves. Shortly afterwards, Moses meets Nun (Kingsley), who informs him of his true lineage; he is the child of Hebrew parents who was sent by his sister Miriam to be raised by Pharaoh's daughter.

Seti dies shortly after Moses' return to Memphis, and Ramses becomes the new pharaoh. Ramses does not want to believe it when he hears the story of Moses's true indentity, when the truth comes out, he decides to send Moses into exile. Before leaving Egypt, Moses meets with his birth mother and Miriam, who refer to him by his birth name of Moishe (and I have to admit I was a bit disappointed not to see a scene where Miriam throws a tantrum about all of the attention her brother is getting. "Why is everything always about him? Moishe Moishe Moishe!")

As we all know, from here Moses journeys into the desert, and eventually converses with God, who is presented in this film, quite literally, in the form of a petulant child, in what is likely to be the most controversial aspect of the film among the "they've rewritten the Bible/Darren Arronofsky ate my baby!" Christian right (who, of course, have a solid and singular claim on these movies about the great Jewish Prophets.). This is not an entirely effective choice, but it's not altogether ineffective, either. Let's face it, this story belongs to the Jews, the Christians, the Muslims, and a whole lot of other people who all have different opinions on who or what God is, and it's impossible to portray Him in a way that will satisfy everyone (even now, someone reading this is taking exception to my designation of God as a Him, and I don't entirely disagree.). The relationship between God and Moses in this film is a unique portrayal, and a standard complaint that I am hearing was actually one of my favorite parts of the film, and a key element to why I loved Noah so such: where many are complaining that Moses is too passive, and not taking a enough of an active role in all of this, I love seeing the Prophets of old portrayed as subject to the same confusion, frustration, doubt and anger that we all face as people trying to keep the faith.

What's more, the portrayal of the miracles and plagues in a more subtle and plausible form really worked for me. The popular Ten Commandments portrayal of God making His (sorry) presence an established fact that Ramses is just too stubborn to admit has never really made sense to me, and even less so the idea that the Hebrews quite literally see Moses stand on a rock, wave his magic staff to part the read sea in half through the power of God, leaving the sand underneath completely dry, but once they are across they immediately decide "well, that worked out all right, let's celebrate with an orgy and the building of idols!" When Bale's Moses asks his people to follow his faith, it's nice to see both that this is not an easy request, and that the faith of Moses is something he himself has to work at like the rest of us do.

Bale is terrific as always, though he and Scott do not completely succeed in making us connect with the character, and it seems as if they are struggling to get a handle on him. The biggest issue is that we don't really get a strong sense that Moses has a great love for either Egypt or the Hebrews, pulling him between the two worlds, the way we see in other versions. The strength of this is in making him feel like an odd duck that doesn't fit in anywhere; the weakness is that we aren't swept up into his motivation. But Bale gets enough mileage out of  Moses's horror at the treatment of the slaves to sell it. Joel Edgerton, a sensational actor who needs to be given more star vehicles, gives the most human portrayal of Pharoah we've seen on screen. The performances are successful all around, though Weaver doesn't quite blend with the rest of the cast because she doesn't do an authentic Hebrew or Egyptian pseudo-British accent. The cinematography by Dariusz Wolski is among the very best of the year. There really is a lot to like about this film, and I found that I held a higher opinion of it than most of the members of the press I viewed it with, but it is simply far too lacking in a strong narrative and too detached to achieve greatness.  To summarize: I liked the movie, many seem to genuinely hate it, and I really, really wanted to love it but just couldn't quite manage it. It's definitely worth a look for those with an open mind, but don't expect a definitive version of this epic tale.

(As a side note, the film is dedicated to Tony Scott, the director's late brother and a prominent director in his own right, which is quite touching for fans of the Scott brothers. Although, to put a cynical spin on it, I must say that given the self referential nature of the film, I pictured Ridley thinking "I owe it to my brother to make to the homage to me that he certainly should have if I'd died first.").

Friday, December 5, 2014

SING YOUR WAY INTO THE WOODS CONTEST


 
Disney invites you to show off your singing skills and your love for the Stephen Sondheim musical “Into the Woods” with the online musical contest “Sing Your Way Into the Woods”.
The winning video will be selected by legendary eight-time Tony®, Grammy® and Oscar®-winning composer and lyricist Stephen Sondheim and Tony® winner James Lapine, who also wrote the screenplay. All videos will be judged based on their musicality, creativity and execution. The winner(s) will receive a private advance screening of Disney’s “Into the Woods” and the winning video and the videos from the three runner-up’s will be featured on the film’s official Tumblr site.So let’s see if you have what it takes to Sing Your Way Into the Woods!
 
The contest is open to choir groups, choral companies, musical theater departments, glee clubs and anyone with a passion for the landmark musical “Into the Woods.”. You decide which part you want to sing and perhaps your wish to win a screening will come true!

Go to www.intothewoodscontest.com to watch the trailer for Disney’s “Into the Woods” for inspiration, download the official music and lyrics to the Prologue and gather your friends and record your own version of the last two-minutes of the iconic Prologue from “Into The Woods”. Rules, guidelines and regulations are posted on the site. Deadline for all submissions is 2 PM (PST) December 12, 2014. 

The contest runs from Friday, December 5, 2014 at 2 PM (PST) until Friday, December 12, 2014 at 2 PM (PST). Winners will be chosen and announced on the site on or about Friday, December 19, 2014. *See abbreviated contest rules*

Into The Woods is a modern twist on several beloved fairy tales, intertwining the plots of a few choice stories and exploring the consequences of the characters’ wishes andInt quests. This humorous and heartfelt musical follows the classic tales of Cinderella (Anna Kendrick), Little Red Riding Hood (Lilla Crawford), Jack and the Beanstalk (Daniel Huttlestone), and Rapunzel (MacKenzie Mauzy), all tied together by an original story involving a Baker and his Wife (James Corden and Emily Blunt), their wish to begin a family and their interaction with the Witch (Meryl Streep), who has put a curse on them. Rob Marshall, the acclaimed filmmaker behind the Academy Award®-winning musical “Chicago” and Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,” directs the film, which is based on the musical stage production by legendary eight-time Tony, Grammy® and Oscar®-winning composer and lyricist Stephen Sondheim and Tony® winner James Lapine, who also wrote the screenplay. Produced by John DeLuca, Marshall, “Wicked” producer Marc Platt and Callum McDougall, “Into the Woods” will be released in theaters December 25, 2014. For more information, like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DisneyIntoTheWoods and follow us on Twitter: @IntoThe Woods.

Disney Contact: Stacey Tesser, The Walt Disney Studios: Stacey.J.Tesser@disney.com

Abbreviated Rules: Sing Your Way INTO THE WOODS: A Musical Contest: No Purchase Necessary to Enter or Win. Void where prohibited or restricted. Open to legal residents of the 50 US and DC, excluding AK, who are at least 18 years old at time of entry. Starts 12/5/14 at 2:01:00 pm PT and ends 12/12/14 at 2:00:00 pm PT. Subject to full Official Rules, available at: www.intothewoodscontest.com. Sponsor: ABC, Inc. d/b/a Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, Burbank, CA.