Thursday, March 27, 2014

NOAH

Reviewed by Patrick Gibbs


GRADE: A

Russell Crowe, Jennifer Connelly, Emma Watson, Anthony Hopkins, Ray Winstone, Logan Lerman,
Written by Darrren Aronofsky and Ari Handel
Directed by Darren Aronofsky

When you hear that someone is making a modern biblical epic, the name Russell Crowe is hardly a surprise name to be tossed around. To quote Chris Rock, "If your movie is set in the past, you best be casting Russell's ass." Grand, old style Hollywood epics like GLADIATOR are where he seems most at home (though I will always maintain that CINDERELLA MAN is actually his overall most endearing performance.). But when picking a director for a Bible story, especially "Noah's Ark," names like Ridley Scott or Mel Gibson may immediately spring to mind, but Darren Aronofsky is one name that decidedly does not.

The director of such heavy, R-Rated and explicit art house fare as Requiem For A Dream and Black Swan is not exactly the most Sunday School friendly presence. The only thing that really seems obvious about the match of director to material is that if there is anyone who could unflinchingly portray a human race so far gone that it seemed justified to wipe them out, it may be Aronofsky. But this is a PG-13. What's more, it's a $125 million dollar blockbuster wannabe. What was the studio thinking? What was the director thinking?

The answer is as complex as the movie itself.

The film begins with, well . . . the beginning, quoted straight from the bestselling book. "There was nothing, not even light." Then it tells the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, of Cain and Abel, and the mark put upon Cain as he committed the first murder.  Familiar, right? But wait, there's more: it also tells the story of "The Watchers," a group of fallen angels who were cast out of heaven for taking pity on Adam and Eve and trying to help them. The Watchers were trapped inside the earth itself, and took the form of rock giants. Imagine if Optimus Prime and "The Thing" from Fantastic Four both had liasons with Treebeard's sister and you couldn't quite figure out which one was the father. Actually, don't, that's disturbing.

Noah (Russell Crowe) is a good man, descended from Seth, and perhaps the last religious man on the planet. Noah follows the teachings of "The Creator," and along with his wife Naameh (Jennifer Connelly), raises his children to do so as well. He also raises an adopted daughter, Iila, whom he found dying of a stomach wound which would leave her barren when she grows into a beautiful young woman played by Emma Watson.

One day, Noah has a vision: the creator is going to destroy the world. Confused by this vision, he goes to speak to the only man he can trust, his grandfather, Methuselah (Anthony Hopkins.). As the two converse and discuss the designs of the creator, Noah has a further revelation that the destruction will come in the form of a flood, destroying all mankind. Naturally, Noah immediately becomes a boating enthusiast and starts plans to build an ark. But it's not long before we meet our villain, Tubal-Cain (played by Ray Winstone, because Edward G. Robinson refused to return Aronofsky's phone calls on the grounds that he has been dead for 40 years.).  Tubal-Cain is the would be king of the people of Cain, and he believes the creator has abandoned man, and therefore they must take care of themselves and do as they feel. This wickedness is seen mostly in the form of violence against animals (Noah and his family are vegetarians), but we also see women being traded as slaves, and a general willingness to kill anything that gets in Tubal-Cain's way. But when he hears that Noah is building an ark, he wants a reserved seat, just in case, but Noah's faithful rock giant friends make good junkyard dogs. (Seriously. Rock giants. I am not making this up.). Tubal-Cain and his people leave, and Noah and Naameh get in a fight when Noah refuses to let his sons go out and get themselves wives to take with them on the journey. Noah has seen that evil lies in all men, including himself and his family. He concludes that it is the Creator's will that he save the animals, who are innocent because they still live as they did in the garden, but that eventually man must perish from the earth. Noah's oldest son, Shem, is okay with this, because he has a hot but barren girlfriend (a must for any man going on the last cruise in existence), but the next in line, Ham (Logan Lerman, of the Percy Jackson films) is pretty upset by the idea of being sentenced to a life of loneliness and . . . well, you know, loneliness.

Of course, when the rain comes down, the floods come up. The family takes to the high seas, the skipper brave and sure that his harsh insistence on not letting anyone else on board, despite plenty of room, is what must be done. But a resentful Ham just might be hiding a stowaway.

This is certainly not for everyone, but it plays much better than it sounds like it would. In fact, much of the film is genuinely mesmerizing.  But at times it becomes as lost as as giant block of wood floating through a deluge. This is unquestionably an art film, yet it has some jaw dropping, overblown Hollywood blockbuster elements. When you say that this is a version of Noah's Ark where the bad guy is firing a flare gun at rock giants, it sounds like you're talking about Michael Bay, not Aronofsky. But this really is an Aronofsky film all the way, for good or bad. It manages to be thought provoking, silly, epic, intimate, profound, inane, brilliant, and stupid all at the same time, and the thing is, for the most part, THAT ACTUALLY WORKED FOR ME. Let's face it: this is a pretty Hollywood story, and in the end, this does not stray nearly as far from the source material as you may think while watching it. Honestly, right down to Jennifer Connelly being in it, the film I would most compare it to is Ang Lee's Hulk, in terms of a deep, thoughtful artist trying to go full Hollywood while remaining true to his artistic nature and as a result making a movie that really works for a certain crowd of people and leaves everyone else utterly puzzled and angry.

The film is at its definitely at its best when it is going the more arsty route, and in particular a sequence where Noah tells the story of the creation and the fall of Cain to his family to explain why they must do what they are doing, is beautifully done and will likely be the most memorable sequence in any film this year, equally effective for believers and non believers alike. Aronofsky uses the iconic biblical tale to explore the relationship between man and God in any time period, and captures the feelings of gratefulness, humility, confusion, resentment, supplication, trust, judgement, forgiveness, and love that come with living a devoutly religious life, and that is no small feat. It's not just about one family's tumultuous journey through the ocean while trying to trust in God, it's about the journey we all take through life trying to do the same.

The Watchers work far better than they have any right to (and are not a completely made up element: they come from Jewish legend and the non canonical Book of Enoch) and I probably would have just gone with them if it wasn't for the added Hollywood touch of the evil stowaway to provide a fight scene that seems straight out of Die Hard. In addition, while it is clearly understood that Aronofsky wants to set the story in such an undetermined time and place that the word "anachronism" is a bit hard to apply, the welding mask and the home pregnancy test strain credibility (again, it sounds worse than it is, especially the latter.).

The performances are strong all around, with Crowe in top form, with a fascinating take on Noah as alternately the lovably sympathetic prophet carrying a heavy burden, or the heartless and dangerously egocentric religious fanatic, depending on how the characters see him at different points throughout the film.  Hopkins makes a delightful Methuselah and Watson steals the whole movie with a heart felt monologue toward the end that provides the most spiritually uplifting moment, and her chemistry with Crowe is undeniable. Logan Lerman, a very subtle and natural actor who had the misfortune of giving a terrible performance in Paul W.S. Anderson's dreadful Three Musketeers,  is saddled with some of the most compelling moments but also some of the silliest, but his earnestness makes it work.  Fairing worst is Ray Winstone as the requisite baddie, which unfortunately is becoming a paragraph I could cut and paste into almost any review these days. As usual for an Aronofsky film, the score by Clint Mansell and cinematography by Matthew Libatique are both stunningly gorgeous, if not terribly subtle.

My final opinion on this one is hard to solidify, and I'll probably jump around a lot on what I thought. In the end, I believe that anyone who completely embraces the film as truly great or utterly dismisses it as terrible is making a hasty judgement that is hard to back up artistically and is more likely based on whatever end of the religious spectrum they are on. But that being said, it could actually go either way which side goes with which conclusion, which is one of the biggest reasons I will not be able to get this movie out of my head for some time. Aronofsky's films can be accused of being many things. Forgettable is not one of them.

Noah is rated PG-13, but should probably be a light R for violence and adult themes. This is not a movie to take your kids to for a number of reasons, but most of all because it is just so heavy.

Friday, March 21, 2014

THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL

THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL
GRADE: A+

Starring Ralph Fiennes, Tony Revolori,  F. Murray Abraham, Adrien Brody, Saorise Ronan, Jeff Goldblum, Bill Murray,
Willem Dafoe, Owen Wilson, Tilda Swinton
Based on the Writings of Stefan Zweig
Written and Directed by Wes Anderson

Reviewed by Paul Gibbs


Wes Anderson is one of the more eccentric, offbeat filmmakers working today, and people largely either love his work or hate it. I tend to fall into the "love it" category, and The Grand Budapest Hotel  now ranks among my favorites of his films. But it's not a film I'll be telling anyone and everyone they should see.  A lot of viewers will leave scratching their heads and wondering if it was supposed to be a comedy (it is, and it's hilarious).

Ralph Fiennes stars as M. Gustave H, a concierge at a posh hotel in a fictional Eastern European nation just before World War II. But we don't get to meet Gustave until making our way through two (yes, too) wraparound devices:  Tom Wilkinson as an aging writer  flashes back to his younger days when he was played by Jude Law and met a man named Zero Moustapha (F. Murray Abraham) at the title hotel. It's Moustapha who tells the story of his days as a young lobby boy (now played by Tony Revolori) taken under the wing of the dashing, flamboyant, romantic and oddly vulgar M. Gustave. Gustave has a tendency to romance old, decrepit women, and one of them (Tilda Swinton in about 70 punds of old age make up) passes away suddenly. Gustave and Zero had to a reading of her will, wherein Gustave is left a priceless painting,  infuriating the old woman's heir Dimitri (Adrien Brody) and his henchman Jopling (Willem Dafoe).

The series of twists and turns the story takes have to be seen to be believed, including a long list of memorable supporting characters, an outrageous chase scene or two, and love story by between Zero and maid played by Soarisie Ronan. The uniformly excellent cast is clearly having a great time, and the delightfully quirky designs and Alexandre Desplat's catchy and unique score are all in perfect compliment to Anderson's usual hilarious dialogue and offbeat characters. Anderson has developed a unique visual style as a director, and an inimitable voice as a writer. His detractors label his films as hipsterish, but his admirers see a unique and electrifying artist. His use of multiple aspect ratios, which could easily have been gimmicky and distracting, actually helps to keep seperate the various threads of the unconventionally structured film, and his tendency to frame his subjects in the center of the image is well suited to the 1:33 ratio in which most of the film is presented. Anderson's use of color is also dazzling, from the hotel to the mountains to the . . .  Sorry, anymore would be a spoiler.

But the film perhaps belongs most of all too Fiennes. Only once before (as a voice in Wallace and Grommit: Curse of the Ware-Rabbit) has the superbly talented actor shown his silly side, and his work here is nothing short of sublime. It's hard too imagine this is the same actor who chilled us to the bone in Schindler's List. It's unfortunate that his work has little to no chance of Oscar recognition, but if he's not nominated for a Golden Globe in the comedy category, those awards will become an even bigger joke than they currently are. And Fiennes and Revolori make a classic comedy team, playing perfectly off of each other.

The Grand Budapest Hotel at times dark and brooding, and at other times silly and whimsical, and sometimes all at once. It's sure to be one of the best films of the still young year. The film is rated R for profanity, sexual references (including a painting which is tacky on every possible level) and violence which ranges from quietly disturbing to gut-bustingly hysterical.





Thursday, March 6, 2014

MR. PEABODY AND SHERMAN


 Reviewed by Paul Gibbs

GRADE: A

Ty Burrell, Max Charles,Ariel Winter Stephen Colbert, Patrick Warburton Lauri Fraser, Stephen Tobolowsky
Based on the Cartoon Created by Jay Ward
Screenplay by Craig Wright
Directed by  Rob Minkoff


Because this latest DreamWorks animated featured is based on a beloved cartoon from my childhood (one which is still very entertaining today, I was both excited and nervous for the film. Happily, Mr. Peabody and Sherman does a much better job than most recent cartoons revivals of both retaining the flavor of the original and updating its sensibilities for a modern audience, as well as fleshing out the story to sustain feature length. And on its own terms, its a funny and extremely engaging family fantasy blockbuster that I enjoyed enough to feel compelled to rush out and see it again.

Mr. Peabody (ably voiced by Ty Burrell) is a genius talking dog who has more Nobel Prizes and achievements than an entire graduating class from M.I.T. Mr. Peabody has adopted a small boy named Sherman, and has taught him history through the use of a time machine (of his own design) called the WABAC machine. But when Sherman gets into a fight on his first day of school, the ability of a dog to act as an adoptive parent for a human is called into question (somebody alert FOX News to interpret this as an attack on traditional families). But when the the family of the girl who bullied Sherman comes over for dinner, Sherman ends up showing her the WABAC, and Mr. Peabody is forced to jump and clean up the mess.

Craig Wright's screenplay features Mr. Peabody's trademark historical puns, as well as more modern humor (though my favorite pop culture reference no doubt went far over the heads of the kids in the audience), and manages to flesh out the principle characters well enough to make us emotionally engaged in the story. The only downside is a few of the expected vulgar and juvenile gags (the most shocking of these is the one that I have to admit made me laugh out loud, but I found the others rather weak). However, that's a mild annoyance in an otherwise delightful movie that easily entertains a wide audience, giving us enough laughs, adventure and heart to earn an enthusiastic recommendation from me. It's great to see Rob Minkoff, director of The Lion King, finally give us another animated classic.

Mr. Peabody and Sherman is rated PG for the aforementioned vulgar gags.



300: RISE OF AN EMPIRE

 Reviewed by Patrick Gibbs

GRADE:F
Sullivan Stapelton, Eva Green, Lena Headey, Hans Matheson, Rodrigo Santoro, Callan Mulvey, Jack O'Connel and David Wenham
Screenplay by Zack Snyder and Kurt Johnstad
Directed by Noam Murro

Let's be honest. 300 was not a great film. But it was a good movie.

Director Zack Snyder's adaptation of Frank Miller's graphic novel about the battle of Thermopylale was a triumph of style over substance, with a breathtaking visual style that perfectly captured Miller's comic. It was also the oddest mixture of virulent, ultra right wing ideology and homoeroticism ever put on film.

This mash up between the sword and sandal epic, Robert Roriguez' Sin City and the Joel Schumacher Batman movies was a solid guilty pleasure. The lead performances by Gerard Butler and Lena Headey were campy but sincere, and the movie was dumb fun, and even occasionally veered into moments of genuine emotion.  Naturally, a movie that sets the box office on fire the way this did, launches a big career for its director, and was so heavily emulated, is going to spawn a sequel. The problem? The title characters were all killed. All of them. All 300 of them.

Frank Miller went to work on a new graphic novel entitled Xerxes, which was to tell the back story of the movie's villain, the "God King" of Persia. This was a problematic idea, and the book was never published. But this didn't deter the studio, who wanted to press ahead with the film. So Zack Snyder and Kurt Johnstad, the duo that wrote the first film, got to work on adapting it into a workable and coherent script. After seeing the film, I can only conclude that they haven't finished yet.

This movie takes place before, during and after the original film. It's pre-mid-sequel!  Themistokles of Athens (Sullivan Stapelton) killed the Perisan king in battle many years ago, but it has haunted him for years that he did not kill the king's son Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) instead. Xerxes has since become a force to be reckoned with, and together with Artemisia of Caria (Eva Green), a sexy warrior General with a chip on her shoulder, Xerxes is getting ready to lay waste to all of Greece.  Themistokles wishes to unite all of Greece into one empire, but cannot gain support for the idea. Meanwhile, King Leonidas of Sparta heads off with his brave 300 to face Xerxes alone, and Themistokles realizes that this brave but doomed stand against Xerxes may be just the catalyst that he is looking for to rally the people together.

The movie is a disjointed mess that has no sense of flow, and Sullivan Stapelton is quite possibly the blandest leading man to hit the big screen since George Lazenby, or at least Miles O'Keefe.  He has no star presence or charisma whatsoever, and barely seems to care about what's going on. The only time he doesn't look bored is during the shockingly graphic sex/fight scene between Temistokles and Artemesia. Eva Green fares better, with a scenery chewing but entertaining performance as the villainess, and she is clearly the main selling  point that the studio is latching onto, focusing more on her sex appeal than her acting ability. In fact, perhaps a more apt title for this film would have been 300: A Sale Of Two Titties.

The violence, though stylized and cheesy, is appallingly graphic, with constant geysers of blood and decapitated heads being thrown at the camera in glorious 3D to distract from the lack of story flow and the painfully bad dialogue. some of the naval battle sequences are admittedly spectacular, but by that point in the film you've had to sit through so much exposition and tedium that it's hard to care, and the only character that all of this back story has managed to build up any sympathy for is Artemisa.

The film works neither as entertainment or art, and frankly it ranks well below at least half of the films on my ten worst list for 2013.

300: Rise Of An Empire is rated R for violence, gore, graphic sex, nudity,  profanity and vulgarity, and in my opinion should have been an NC17, at least when shown in 3D.